About Us

Energy Supply, Reliability
Jul 19, 2013  Comment

Geothermal Versus Liquefied Natural Gas

Question: Will Yukon Energy ever consider using geothermal energy in the Yukon as well as or as an alternative to natural gas? Yes indeed, we have been looking at geothermal for several years now. There is some information about our geothermal work both on our website and our blog. What we need in order to produce geo-thermal electricity is very hot water (100 to 120 degrees C) and not the warm water available now and used by Mayo and parts of Whitehorse to heat buildings, etc. Our early research has indicated there is good geothermal potential in Yukon. The problem is finding the right spot (it's like drilling for oil in that regard). Drilling test holes is very expensive and it would be possible to drill a lot of holes before finding a good location. We are hoping we can partner with others as we move forward in our search for geothermal power. In fact we are just starting to work with the Kaska Nation on a geothermal research project, so stay tuned for updates on that in the days ahead. Geothermal would be a great energy source for us, as it's both reliable and renewable. In terms of affordability, we don't have enough information yet to know exactly what geothermal would cost per kilowatt hour. We do know that while the initial capital cost would be high, once a geothermal system is set up it would be relatively inexpensive to operate. Unfortunately, we don't see this as something that could come on stream in the next couple of years, in time to replace our two Whitehorse diesel generators that need to be retired. In terms of meeting that short-term requirement, Yukon Energy believes natural gas is the best option available to us at the moment. 

Energy Supply
Jul 22, 2013  3

Is Green Energy A Pipe Dream?

 Here's an article that was in yesterday's Edmonton Sun. We'd be interested in hearing your thoughts. Green energy a pipe dream; countries around world realizing that traditional energy only viable way to go Lorne Gunter, Edmonton Sun Sun Jul 21 2013 This week, Australia and Spain both cancelled most or all of their enormous subsidies for green energy. Germany has done so already. And Britain is expected to follow suit shortly. Why? The subsidies are backbreakingly expensive and utterly useless. No matter how much money governments throw at wind power, solar power or other alternate energy sources, the results are always the same: little or no new energy is produced and there is no reduction in carbon emissions despite the billions thrown at green projects. The Spanish government, like most European governments, is staggering under a mountain of public debt after having used borrowed money for decades to pay for massive social benefits. Spain's green energy subsidies were among the most generous in Europe -- about $5.75 billion annually in a country of 47 million people. Madrid's deep commitment brought it much praise from environmentalists who have held Spain up as a shining example of what governments can achieve if only they find sufficient will to act. Except all of Spain's expensive actions have led to nothing: no energy revolution, no new green jobs, no reduction in greenhouse gases. Madrid's chosen form of subsidy, like Ontario's, has been to vastly overpay producers of alternate energy for the meager amounts of non-carbon electricity they provide. As in Ontario, this has meant billions given to windmill companies and solar panel owners even though their projects are uneconomic and their electricity is hard to get to market. From the beginning, Spain was warned by free-market economists that its plan was destined to fail -- and bound to waste billions of tax dollars. But, as with so many governments and environmentalists, Spain has been guilty of magic-wand thinking: If only it would spend enough money giving green energy a nudge, non-carbon energy would magically become profitable and painlessly replace carbon-based based fuels such as oil, natural gas and coal. Well, when nudging didn't produce the promised results -- dynamic new industries and scads of new, well-paying, morally satisfying "green" jobs -- Spain decided to try a two-handed shove to get its alternate energy sector going. If small subsidies weren't enough, surely big ones would be. That didn't work either. Indeed, it's hard to believe thinking people ever believed it could. Green energy hasn't failed to replace traditional sources because of lack of public funding. It has never rivaled traditional energy because economically it can't. Just look at solar energy. With traditional energy, the power is generated comparatively cheaply in centralized locations. From there it is distributed to consumers via an electrical grid. With solar energy, the power is produced in smaller amounts in decentralized locations from which it must be collected via a grid only to then be redistributed to customers. Despite billions in tax dollars given to Spanish (and Ontario) solar producers, no one has yet found an economic way to connect thousands of collection sites to millions of consumers. The solution, so far, has been for governments to overpay for solar power (sometimes on the order of 20 times the market rate for electricity) in hopes that somehow this would provoke a profitable industry. But that was self-evidently doomed to fail from the start. Wind power is simply too unpredictable. For instance, too often when it is hot and more power is needed to run air conditioners, it is also calm. There is simply no wind to generate power. Australia announced this week it was giving up on carbon taxes that were adding hundreds of dollars to Australians' power bills without any appreciable reduction in power consumption or emissions. These countries are coming to realize green energy is a dream, only -- and a very expensive one. - - - lorne.gunter@sunmedia.ca  

Community Involvement, Environment
Jul 24, 2013  Comment

Dispatches From the Fishladder

It's been a busy summer at Yukon Energy's Whitehorse Rapids Fishladder. We've had a large number of grayling travelling up and down the ladder (in one day alone, staff counted more than 70!), and more trout than usual too. Of course many people are waiting for the headliners, the Chinook salmon, to arrive. They will start to show up in about two weeks, and will be seen in the largest numbers by about the middle of August. The best time to view them is first thing in the morning (9 a.m.) when the facility opens for the day. There are lots of other things to do at the fishladder apart from enjoying a close-up view of the fish. For instance, this year we are continuing with our Elders Interpretive Program. Gwitchin elder Mary Decker makes herself available each Monday from 1 to 2 p.m. to share stores and answer people's questions. On most Thursdays from 1 to 2 p.m. Carcross Tagish elder Doris McLean can be found in our First Nations' tent. These two woman are a wealth of knowledge and a delight to talk to. The fishladder is open seven days a week from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. until next Sunday. After that operation hours will be from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., throughout the month of August. There is a suggested donation of $3 to visit the ladder. The proceeds go towards the Yukon Fish and Game Association, which operates the facility for us. Of course fish aren't the only creatures that can be seen at the fishladder. This curious porcupine paid us a visit earlier this month.